doc-claims.sh could not run on this tree until the previous commit, and its
first run found both immediately.
docs/data/README.md illustrated the wrong place to put an asset by naming
`docs/data/logo.webp` in backticks. A backticked path is a claim the file
exists, so the example of where NOT to put a file asserted that a file was
there. Reworded to name the two directories instead, both of which exist.
project-readme-template.md linked docs/architecture/Engineering_Reference_Manual.md,
a document the template does not ship and most projects will never write. It
now points at docs/architecture/README.md, which every scaffolded project has,
and says to name a reference manual beside it once there is one.
Left unfixed, every project adopting this template would inherit a red
doc-claims from its first day, and a permanently red gate is one everybody
learns to ignore -- audit-gate.mjs makes that argument at length about npm
advisories, and it applies here.
This is the third instance this session of one shape: a document that
describes an absent or forbidden path becomes an assertion that it exists.
The others were docs/planning/FUTURE.md in BATCH_LEDGER.md and an `Exempt:`
line inside a code fence.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
da8e457e97