Eleven copy and SEO defects measured against docs/design/REDESIGN_REVIEW.md — vague hero headlines, service descriptions with no ROI or SLA language, generic CTAs, and framing too casual for enterprise B2B.
Not a rewrite for its own sake: the positioning document is the standard and these are the places the site does not meet it.
Landed when: all eleven are closed and the home, services and support heroes read as the review describes.
The work that cannot be done without the site owner. Two of these are live claims the business may not be able to substantiate — a certification number that appears fabricated, and an unverified '25+ years'.
Blocked by construction, and tracked rather than forgotten. See Levi.md (untracked) for the letter these came from.
Landed when: every claim on the site is one the owner has confirmed.
Testimonials and a blog. Both need real content from the owner and neither is started; they are here so the project card does not read as though they were forgotten.
Landed when: each is either built with real content or closed as declined.
Work created by adopting the project template on 2026-08-18. Small, real, and none of it invented to fill the tracker.
Landed when: the project card renders a banner, the lead database has a scheduled off-machine backup, and CORS names the origin the site is actually served from.