Policy set by _null. The stack pins :vX.Y.Z — never :dev, never :latest. The reason is what a pointer cannot do. A stack file naming :dev says "dev" today and will still say "dev" after the image underneath it changes, so the file records a preference rather than a fact and "what is running?" has no answer that survives the next push. Rollback is worse: there is nothing to roll back TO, because a pointer only ever names now. deploy.sh: with no --tag it now resolves the newest published NUMBERED version from the registry and says which it picked, instead of defaulting to :dev. A floating tag is refused outright, with --allow-floating as the loud escape hatch for the one case that is not a mistake — reproducing a fault on whatever a pointer currently is. release.sh: no longer moves :dev. It published both tags until now because the stack followed the pointer; under this policy nothing deploys :dev, so moving it would only publish something that misrepresents what is running. scripts/docker-push.sh deleted, with its npm script. Its entire job was building and pushing an unnumbered :dev with no version bump and no guards, which is now the exact thing the policy exists to prevent. Keeping a command that quietly violates a policy is how the policy stops being true. :dev and :latest stay in the registry, frozen. Not deleted: the running container was created from :dev, and removing the tag an existing deployment names is how a recreate fails to pull. Stack 58 still pins :dev as this lands. Correcting that is the first deploy made under the policy, and it is why the default resolves a version rather than reusing whatever the stack already names. Guards proven: default resolves v0.8.3; --tag dev refused; --tag latest refused; --allow-floating warns and proceeds; unpublished tag still refused. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| GUARDS.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| zoho-setup.md | ||
README.md
Architecture — Queue North Website
Status: Current
Owner: _null
Last reviewed: 2026-08-18
Governs: docs/architecture/**, server/index.js, scripts/** — the module
boundaries, the database schema and the API response shapes
Review trigger: Any new module, any change to a module boundary or a data shape;
any new table or column; any new external service the server
calls; any change to how routes are prerendered
The shape of it
One Express process serves everything. There is no separate web server, no reverse proxy inside the container, and no second runtime.
browser
|
+── queuenorth.com ──► nginx-proxy-manager (thor/exodus) ┐ PRODUCTION
| │
+── qn.isnull.dev ───► Cloudflare ─────────────────────────┤
v
Express (server/index.js, port 3001) on nebula ← the only process, one instance
|
+--> dist/ prerendered HTML + the React bundle, served static
+--> /api/health liveness, and a real SELECT against SQLite
+--> /api/leads POST → validate → SQLite → (fire and forget) Zoho
+--> /api/support POST → validate → SQLite → (fire and forget) Zoho Cases
|
+--> db/queuenorth.db better-sqlite3, synchronous, single writer
|
+--> Google reCAPTCHA v3 verify, server-side, before any insert
+--> Zoho CRM WebToLead form post, or REST/OAuth as a standby
Module boundaries
src/ knows nothing about the database. It talks to three JSON endpoints
through src/lib/api.js and nothing else. There is no ORM in the client, no
shared schema module, and no import that crosses from src/ into server/.
server/index.js knows nothing about React. It serves dist/ as static
files and falls through to dist/index.html for client routes. The one place
this is not quite true is the privacy policy, below.
src/data/*.js is the content layer. Services, industries and the privacy
policy text live there as plain data, imported by both the client pages and
src/entry-server.jsx. Adding a service is a data edit, not a component edit.
scripts/prerender.js is a build step, not a runtime. It renders every route
to static HTML at build time using src/entry-server.jsx. Nothing at request
time renders React on the server.
The three boundaries worth knowing about
-
The privacy policy has two renderers, one source.
src/data/privacyPolicy.jsis the single source of truth;src/pages/PrivacyPolicy.jsxrenders it in the SPA and the prerender step emits a static copy. This exists because Meta's crawler does not execute JavaScript, and a policy it cannot read is a policy that does not count. Do not add policy text to a component. -
Zoho is an overlay, never a dependency. Every handler writes SQLite first and then calls the forwarder without awaiting it. A Zoho outage, a bad token or a network timeout costs a CRM record and never a lead.
forwardLeadToZohodispatches toforwardToZohoWebToLeadorforwardToZohoonZOHO_FORWARDING_MODE; both carry a 10 sAbortController. -
reCAPTCHA is the one thing that runs before the insert. It is the only check that can reject a submission outright, so it is deliberately the only external call on the blocking path — with a 5 s timeout, and it fails open when
RECAPTCHA_ENABLEDis false.
Data shapes
server/index.js owns the schema and applies it at startup via initSchema().
There is no external migration runner; the one migration that exists rebuilds
leads to add the UNIQUE constraint and is idempotent.
leads
| Column | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
id |
INTEGER PK AUTOINCREMENT | |
company |
TEXT NOT NULL | max 200 after sanitisation |
name |
TEXT NOT NULL | max 100. Split on the last space for Zoho's First_Name / Last_Name |
email |
TEXT NOT NULL UNIQUE | max 254 (RFC 5321). A duplicate answers 409, and the Zoho forward is still attempted — the local row existing does not mean the CRM record does |
phone |
TEXT | |
zip |
TEXT | maps to Zoho Zip_Code |
message |
TEXT | |
service_interest |
TEXT | normalised from empty to NULL. Maps to Zoho Description, not a custom field |
created_at |
DATETIME | CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
support_requests
| Column | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
id |
INTEGER PK AUTOINCREMENT | |
name, company, email |
TEXT NOT NULL | no UNIQUE — the same customer may raise many tickets |
phone |
TEXT | |
issue |
TEXT NOT NULL | minimum 10 characters, enforced client and server side |
priority |
TEXT | defaults to medium |
created_at |
DATETIME | CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
The asymmetry between the two tables is deliberate. A lead is a person you
want once; a support request is an event that recurs. Adding UNIQUE to
support_requests.email would silently drop a customer's second ticket.
Every response shape the API produces
| Status | Body | When |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | the resource, or {status, db, timestamp} |
success |
| 400 | {error: 'Validation failed', fields: {…}} |
Zod rejected it |
| 403 | {error} |
reCAPTCHA below RECAPTCHA_MIN_SCORE |
| 404 | {error: 'Not found'} |
unmatched /api/* only; other paths fall through to the SPA |
| 409 | {error} |
duplicate leads.email |
| 413 | — | body over 1 MB |
| 429 | {error, message, retryAfter} |
rate limiter |
| 500 | {error} |
never a stack trace |
| 503 | {error, db: 'error'} |
health check could not reach SQLite |
| 504 | {error: 'Request timeout'} |
the 30 s request timeout fired |
Documents here
GUARDS.md— how to write a check that actually checks. Read it before adding a structural test or a probe; every rule in it was learned from a guard that had been green over something broken.zoho-setup.md— the CRM integration end to end: app setup, credentials, environment variables, and how to confirm a lead arrived.
What ships in scripts/
Ten scripts came from the template on 2026-08-18 and three were already here.
The template's full catalogue is a menu, not an inventory — see
../TOOLS.md. This table is what this project actually has, and
each row says what it does here.
| Path | What it is |
|---|---|
scripts/check-env.sh |
which of the 17 Zoho / reCAPTCHA / CORS / rate-limit variables are set and plausible, before the server reads them. Exit 2 means nothing was checked |
scripts/secrets.sh |
credential shapes in a staged diff, and --tracked for a whole-tree audit. --built dist/ is the one that matters here: VITE_RECAPTCHA_SITE_KEY is inlined into the bundle at build time, so the repository scan cannot see what users receive. Carries this project's own shapes, and one tightened pattern — see below |
scripts/verify.sh |
every check this project has, in one table. Honestly thin — there is no test suite, and it says so rather than printing a green row |
scripts/doc-triggers.py |
which documents a pending change fires, read from the Governs: headers. Run it before committing, not after |
scripts/forgejo-issue.py |
files and closes issues in the tracker convention, refusing malformed ones before they are filed |
scripts/status.sh |
what is running on nebula as qn-website-dev, its version and its restart count. Read-only |
scripts/healthcheck.sh |
a liveness tick against queuenorth.com, asserting HTTP 200 and "status":"ok" and "db":"ok" — a 503 with a JSON body is a real answer, not an outage. HEALTHCHECK_BASE_URL points it at the other front door |
scripts/preflight.sh |
headers and TLS against the live origin. No --auth checks: there are no accounts |
scripts/backup.sh |
a verified SQLite dump. Its ENGINE block was rewritten for better-sqlite3's online .backup() — see below |
scripts/restore-check.sh |
restores the newest dump into a scratch file, runs PRAGMA integrity_check, counts tables, and times it. A backup nobody has restored is a guess |
scripts/release.sh |
publishes. Bump, guard, build, verify the image's own version label, push :vX.Y.Z, commit last, tag. Refuses to overwrite a published tag, to build on a dirty tree, or to build when the three hard-coded copies of the public origin disagree. Adapted from PrivacyLLC-Web's — see below |
scripts/deploy.sh |
deploys, and does not build. Points Portainer stack 58 at an already-published numbered version — it refuses a floating tag — taking a verified backup first and preserving the stack's twelve environment variables, then waits for health and checks both public origins. Reports the digest before and after |
| scripts/docker-test.sh | builds the image and runs it locally on 3001. Predates the template |
| scripts/prerender.js | the build step that emits static HTML for every route. Predates the template |
Why release.sh and deploy.sh are two scripts. Publishing an image and
running it are separate decisions, which is the rule both the template and
PrivacyLLC-Web's release script state and the reason neither of them deploys.
The template's deploy.py does build, push and deploy; adopting it beside
release.sh would have produced two commands that both build, a second image
for the same code, and two answers to "what is running". So deploy.sh does
only the half that was missing.
Three things about release.sh differ from the script it was adapted from, and
each is a fact about this project rather than a preference:
- It gates on
verify.sh, not on a test suite, because there is not one. The original refuses to release on a half-run 1,600-test run; this one says out loud that a build, a secret scan and a doc-header check are not tests and that nothing in the gate exercised a route, a form or an API response. - It publishes one tag and does not move
:dev. Both scripts follow the policy below: production always runs a numbered version, so nothing deploys a pointer and publishing one would only misrepresent what is running. - It checks the public origin in three files rather than one. The original
passes its origin in as a build arg, so it has one copy to validate. Here
https://queuenorth.comis written out insrc/lib/seo.js,src/components/SEO.jsxandscripts/prerender.js, and it is baked into every canonical URL,og:url,sitemap.xmlandrobots.txt. The guard asks whether the three still agree, because a wrong origin cannot be corrected without another build and is invisible until somebody reads the page source.
Neither script prunes the registry. The original does, because it releases often enough for that to matter. This project has published thirteen tags in its life, deleting a published image is irreversible, and the one that matters is whichever the running container was created from — exactly what a newest-N rule gets wrong.
Why secrets.sh has a tightened pattern. Its user:pass@host in a URL
rule excludes only /, @, : and whitespace in the template. That is right
for source and wrong for this project's build output: every prerendered page
carries schema.org JSON-LD, and //queuenorth.com"},"areaServed":{"@ parses as
a host, a password and an @. Ten findings per --built run, one more for
every page added — the noise that turns a scanner into something people mute.
Quotes, braces, commas and angle brackets cannot occur in real userinfo, so
excluding them costs nothing and was checked against three real credential URLs
before being applied. The reasoning is in the script's own header.
Why backup.sh and restore-check.sh are not the template's originals. Both
ship as PostgreSQL tools. backup.sh is built to be adapted — everything
engine-specific is in one ENGINE block — so that block now calls
better-sqlite3's .backup() inside the running container and verifies the
result with sqlite3 before renaming it into place. restore-check.sh had no
such seam: it is pg_restore and psql end to end, so the SQLite version is a
rewrite that keeps the argument and replaces the mechanism.
What does not belong here
- Product intent — that is
docs/planning/PROJECT_PLAN.md - Engineering standards and the stack policy — that is
docs/planning/REQUIREMENTS.md - What it should look and sound like — that is
docs/design/ - What happened while building it — that is
docs/history/
A note on drift
Architecture docs go stale faster than any other kind, because code changes under them silently. This is exactly what the Review trigger line is for: name the change that should send somebody back here, and a reader can tell whether the trigger has fired.
The specific instance to avoid in this repository: BUILD_SUMMARY.md carried a
copy of the SQL schema that predated the UNIQUE constraint on leads.email.
It was not carried forward on adoption. server/index.js owns the schema; the
tables above describe it and do not duplicate it.