§45 asks for biometric/PIN gating. UserPreferences.biometricLockEnabled has
existed since Batch 01 with nothing outside its own module reading it; this
wires it, and adds the rest.
The recovery question was the reason #34 sat open, and it is decided: there is
no recovery. A backdoor into a period tracker's lock would be used by exactly
the person the lock exists to stop. Everything below follows from that.
## The gate
AppLockGate wraps the whole composition rather than being a screen inside it.
Today, Calendar and Insights each start collecting from CycleRepository the
moment they compose, so a lock implemented as a nav destination would already
have read the history before the user proved anything. content() is invoked
only in the unlocked branch.
Re-lock on ON_STOP, not ON_PAUSE — pause fires for the shade, quick settings
and a permission dialog. Two guards on top: isChangingConfigurations, or
rotation and the fontScale-2.0 pass both re-lock; and authInProgress, or an OEM
biometric overlay that stops the activity produces a lock that can never be
opened. No grace period: SECURITY.md leads with "someone who picks up an
unlocked phone", which is the window a grace period covers.
The unlock flag lives in a @Singleton, never in saved state. rememberSaveable
looks like the obvious home and would restore a background-killed app already
unlocked — the single most likely way to meet the lock screen would be the one
path that skipped it.
## What is stored is not the PIN
mac = HMAC(keystoreKey, 0x01 || salt || PBKDF2-SHA256(pin, salt, 210k))
Two layers because they defend different things. The Keystore MAC is what makes
a six-digit PIN safe at all — a million candidates is nothing to an attacker who
can compute the hash, and impossible for one who cannot get the key off the
device. PBKDF2 underneath is for the day that assumption breaks. 0x01 is a
domain-separation tag; the lockout counter is MACed under 0x02.
The key omits six builder calls and the KDoc names every one. setUserAuthenti-
cationRequired is the important absence: it would bind the key to the device
lock, so changing a passcode would destroy it — and under no-recovery that is
somebody's whole history gone for an unrelated reason. It would also be a
bypass, since SECURITY.md already names "someone who knows the unlock PIN" as
an adversary. The biometric key is separate and takes the opposite policy,
where invalidation correctly degrades to "use your PIN".
## Wrong PINs cost time, never data
Four free attempts, then 30s/1m/2m/5m/15m, capped forever. No attempt limit and
no auto-wipe: under no-recovery an auto-wipe would let a partner, a child or a
pocket destroy a history while knowing nothing. Both clock bypasses are closed —
the wait is the longer of a wall-clock and a monotonic deadline, and a reboot
re-applies it in full, detected by elapsedRealtime going backwards.
## Two writes that had to move
Tapping "Not yet" on a reminder writes a NotYetObservation. That button is on
the phone's own lock screen, reachable by anybody, so the action is now parked
in AppLockController and applied only after an unlock — dropped if the session
never unlocks. Behaviour is unchanged when the lock is off.
The erase behind "Forgot your PIN?" deletes health data, then the Keystore key,
then the lock store. Skipping the middle step leaves the user erased AND still
locked out; prove-guard mutates that line out and requires exactly one red.
## Found by testing, not by review
- A fresh install began in a 15-minute lockout: "no counter yet" and "counter
was tampered with" were the same value. They are now distinct.
- Setting a PIN locked you out of the session you set it in. Found on the
emulator, not in a test.
- Kotlin block comments nest, so `domain/*` in a KDoc opens one. Twice.
## Verified
244 JVM tests, 0 skipped. KeystoreVerifierTest runs on PeriodMinSdk26 and
PeriodQA — including that PBKDF2WithHmacSHA256 exists at API 26, the one choice
here with no margin, and that the key is not auth-bound on either.
On device: wrong PIN refused, correct PIN opens, am kill then reopen lands on
the lock screen, turning the lock off requires the current PIN, and
`adb exec-out screencap` returns mean=0 stddev=0 — FLAG_SECURE is real.
androidx.biometric 1.1.0 is the newest stable (1.4.0 is alpha; biometric-ktx
never shipped one). It merges USE_BIOMETRIC and USE_FINGERPRINT, which failed
checkPermissions until they were allowed on purpose, and it drags fragment to
1.5.1 — pinned to 1.9.0 since MainActivity is now a FragmentActivity.
closes#34
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The application scope in PeriodApplication was built with SupervisorJob and
no CoroutineExceptionHandler, and ReminderCoordinator launchIns two Room
flows on it. SupervisorJob stops a failing child cancelling its siblings; it
does not stop the exception, which reaches the thread's default handler and
ends the process.
That scope is the one that runs with nobody watching. Application.onCreate
runs in every process, including the ones WorkManager starts after a reboot
and at the daily reminder — no Activity, no screen, nothing to show an error.
Both ViewModels already install a handler; the one place a crash is invisible
did not.
The trigger is real rather than theoretical: repository.forecast runs the
prediction engine inside the flow, and Prediction's init block enforces its
window invariants with require.
Three layers, outermost last:
- ReminderCoordinator catches per chain, so one failing collection cannot
take the other down. Doing nothing on failure is deliberate — cancelling
the schedule would turn a failed read into reminders silently switched
off until the user next touched a notification setting.
- ReminderWorker returns success and posts nothing when it cannot read what
it needs, which is already its behaviour with no history. Cancellation is
rethrown rather than swallowed.
- The scope handler is a backstop whose only job is that the process lives.
It cannot log: checkNoHealthLogging covers this module, and an exception
message here can carry a date derived from a cycle.
The chains moved into internal functions taking flows so the catch is
reachable from a test. CycleRepository is final with an internal constructor,
which is right for a data boundary and wrong for faking, and adding a mocking
library to reach one catch would have been the worse trade.
Proved to fail, per GUARDS.md §1: removing the handler fails exactly one test
(ApplicationScopeTest.kt:69), and removing either catch fails exactly its own.
GUARDS.md gains §8. prove-guard.sh decides a guard caught the mutation from
the runner's exit code, and cannot tell a broken test from a malformed
command. Its first use here reported a clean catch when Gradle had actually
rejected `:app:test --tests` as an unknown option and run nothing. The same
tool's line-counting fallback also means the three documented boundary proofs
in architecture/README.md have been exiting 3 rather than 0 since they were
written; they now carry the fail pattern that makes them exit 0.
closes#45
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
closes#38
checkNoHealthLogging fails the build on any logging call in a module that can
see a cycle date. It runs in `./gradlew check`.
WHY IT IS A GUARD AND NOT A GREP
Both traps were already live in this repository. PeriodApplication passes
android.util.Log.WARN to WorkManager as a CONSTANT, which is not a log call.
ReminderWorker's KDoc says "a Log.d in a worker is the kind that survives",
explaining why there isn't one — a naive grep fails the build on the clearest
possible explanation, and the obvious fix is to delete the explanation. So it
matches a call shape, and strips comments first.
Proved both directions per GUARDS.md §1: an injected Log.d in CycleRepository
produced exactly one failure; a comment containing Log.d( and println( stayed
green. It also failed its own first run by walking domain/*/bin/, a gitignored
IDE output holding stale copies of test files — a guard that fails on untracked
build output is one somebody switches off.
THE LEAK IT WAS NOT LOOKING FOR
Prediction's init block interpolated dates into its require messages:
require(!windowStart.isAfter(windowEnd)) { "window start $windowStart is..." }
Five predicted dates across three messages, inside an IllegalArgumentException —
the one string a crash reporter collects without anybody choosing to log it.
§45 forbids exactly this and no logging statement was involved.
The same applies to every data class, since toString() renders every field into
any string that touches it. PeriodRecord, SpottingRecord, CycleRecord,
Prediction and NotYetObservation now override it: ids and cycle lengths survive,
dates do not. NoDatesInDiagnosticsTest pins seven cases and was itself proved to
fail.
R8 -assumenosideeffects strips android.util.Log from release, covering what a
source guard cannot reach: a dependency logging on our behalf, and a module
added without being listed in the guard.
VERIFIED ON A RELEASE BUILD, NOT REASONED ABOUT
assembleRelease signed with the debug keystore, installed, driven from
onboarding to a forecast and then logging a period: zero ISO dates in logcat,
zero health words, and the only mentions of the package are the system's own. A
screenshot confirms it reached a real forecast, because "no logs" is trivially
true of an app that did nothing.
201 tests pass. All three guards green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every document in the tree audited against the source, the tracker and git
history, each finding then given to a second reader tasked with refuting it.
74 raised, 12 refuted, 57 applied. No code changed.
THE README DESCRIBED A SKELETON
Its Status table — the one place a claim about what is built is allowed to live
— still read "there is no usable app yet", with Not built against Room, the four
core screens, fertility and notifications, and No round run against QA. Five
batches had shipped and three QA rounds had run.
TWO DOCUMENTS WERE SILENTLY NEVER FIRING
architecture/README.md and design/README.md wrote Governs: as prose ("the Gradle
module graph", "the design tokens in core/designsystem"). Neither contains a
path token, so doc-triggers.py reduced them to globs matching nothing, and one
real glob apiece made them look path-governing rather than subject-governing —
the state the script's own header calls invisible. Editing a Room entity never
fired the document owning the migration table. Both now fire, proved by running
the script.
SECURITY.md CLAIMED FOUR UNBUILT PROTECTIONS
App lock listed among what works offline; biometric/PIN gating described as
protecting app launch; the incognito launcher as existing; Play Billing in the
third parties table without the "not yet integrated" marker its neighbours
carry. All are Batch 06/07 work.
The advertising boundary was overstated in SECURITY.md and the README alike:
both said the ads module declares no dependency and a guard proves it. There is
no ads module. The pre-declared ":core:ads" to emptySet() rule is stricter than
the sentence it replaced and matches nothing until Batch 07, which is why the
guard is proved by injection rather than trusted.
SMALLER, EACH A REAL TRAP
WORK_CYCLE.md pointed at docs/architecture/scripts/forgejo-issue.py, a template
path absent here — missed by doc-claims.sh, which reads backticked prose and not
fenced blocks. ClaudeReport.md's Round notes said "No rounds yet" after three
rounds because ClaudeQAPlan.md's after-a-round list never named that section;
the playbook is fixed first. The instrumented-test count was eight in three
places and is four. HISTORY.md said the repository had no code and that nothing
had been tried and dropped, when three approaches had.
DELIBERATELY UNCHANGED
ClaudeReport.md's last verified build SHA stays at 0451fbe — no round has run
since, and moving it would claim a verification nobody performed. Every
DEVELOPMENT_LOG entry stays as written.
Guards: ./gradlew check, schema-guard.sh, doc-claims.sh (235 claimed paths, all
present), doc-triggers.py, and a link sweep over 21 markdown files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
§28, §29, §30 and §31. NotificationCopy is a pure function — privacy mode plus
kind plus day count in, two versions of the text out — so every combination is
tested exhaustively without an emulator. This is the one surface whose mistakes
are visible to somebody who is not the user, so the tests are exhaustive rather
than representative: every kind × every mode asserts that no health word reaches
a lock screen outside Direct, and that includes the ACTION LABELS, which §31
points out are visible text too. A perfectly discreet body under a button
reading "Started my period" leaks anyway.
TWO ANDROID BEHAVIOURS THAT LEAK IF YOU TRUST THE DOCS
A private notification with no public version does not blank the lock screen —
it shows the private text. NotificationText therefore has no nullable title and
an instrumented test asserts every kind attaches one.
And a notification channel is IMMUTABLE after creation: importance and
lock-screen visibility cannot be changed. One shared channel would have kept
whatever the user's first privacy mode set, forever — switching from Direct to
Maximum privacy would have appeared to work and changed nothing. There is now
one channel per mode. Found by an instrumented test on a device; nothing in the
unit tests could have seen it.
§30's stopping rule is a test of its own: the app asks a bounded number of times,
says "We'll stop checking for now. Log your period whenever it begins.", and
then says nothing more — while the engine keeps learning, which is the sentence
§30 puts right after it.
WorkManager, and no exact alarms. §31 rules them out and the new checkPermissions
task fails the build if one ever appears in the merged manifest — from here or
from a dependency. That guard also failed its own first proof, reading a stale
manifest because it did not depend on the task that writes one.
ReminderCoordinator reschedules whenever the forecast moves, which §31 asks for
and is the requirement most likely to be missed: a "Not yet" moves the forecast,
so work queued against the old one is aimed at a day that no longer means
anything.
188 unit tests and 6 instrumented, all passing. ./gradlew check green.
closes#24closes#25closes#26closes#27
TOOLS.md said "exit code 2 is never a pass", which is right and was only half
the rule. The pre-commit hook read it as "2 is always a refusal" and made every
deletion-only commit impossible while reporting a credential that did not exist.
Both documents now carry the completed rule: on a 2, ask whether the check could
have had anything to look at. The hooks README records the one place the two
scripts are treated differently and why.
§17 and §18. Ovulation is estimated a luteal phase before the PREDICTED next
period rather than counted forwards from the last one — the luteal phase is the
stable half of the cycle, which is why §17 asks for it that way — and the
fertile window opens five days before ovulation and closes one day after,
because sperm survive and the egg does not.
The uncertainty is inherited, not invented. Ovulation is derived from a
predicted date, so it can never be more certain than that prediction.
THE PART THE DEVICE TAUGHT
The first version showed a user one cycle in a fertile window of 8 Aug – 24 Aug.
Seventeen days. Arithmetically honest, and completely useless — over half a
cycle, dressed up as a feature.
So the estimate now returns null past a usable uncertainty, and Today says "Not
enough history to estimate. Log a few more cycles and the app will be able to
estimate ovulation." Three stable cycles later the same user gets 12 Aug – 20
Aug, which is worth reading. Verified in both states on a device.
That is the same shape as PredictionAccuracy refusing figures below three scored
forecasts and CycleInsights withholding an average below two intervals, and it
is now written down in the architecture doc as a rule rather than three
coincidences: the app declines rather than stretches.
§18'S PROHIBITION IS A TYPE, NOT A CONVENTION
FertilityLikelihood has LOWER, HIGHER and UNKNOWN and no fourth value. Somebody
reading "safe" would take a decision on it; the estimate comes from a predicted
date carrying days of uncertainty; and §18 has already promised this is not
contraception. A test asserts no label contains a permission word, so adding one
is a deliberate act with a failing test.
The disclaimer travels with the feature — same screen, same time. A disclaimer
one tab away is a disclaimer nobody read.
ANOTHER GREYSCALE COLLISION
The ovulation star was centred, which put it directly behind the numeral: in
greyscale "18" and the mark merged into one smudge. Ovulation is now the fertile
ring plus a small star low in the cell, which is also semantically right — that
day IS inside the window, and the pair reads as "that window, and this day".
Nine Compose ModifierParameter warnings fixed properly rather than suppressed.
164 tests, all passing. ./gradlew check green, 0 lint errors.
closes#21closes#22closes#23
PersonalPredictionEngine keeps a discrete probability distribution over
candidate start dates rather than a date with a margin bolted on. Everything the
product needs falls out of that one structure: the most likely date is its mode,
the window is the narrowest span holding 80% of the mass, and a "Not yet" is the
distribution conditioned on what the user just said — which is what §13 asks for
and what a date-plus-margin design cannot express at all.
It is better, and that is a number rather than an opinion. EngineComparisonTest
scores both engines over the §51 fixtures on every build:
engine MAE mean window within +/-2 window covered
baseline 1.00 2.67 7/9 7/9
personal 0.67 4.56 9/9 9/9
COVERAGE IS THE MEASURE, NOT WIDTH
The first version of that test asserted the new windows must not be wider, and
it failed. Measuring showed why the assertion was wrong: the fixtures where the
personal engine is wider are the ones that are genuinely less certain — a
history with a suspected missing period, and one with a 45-day outlier — and the
baseline answers both with a two-day window and misses. What a window promises
is that the period starts inside it. An engine keeping that promise 7 times in 9
has a broken promise, not a tight forecast. The test now asserts coverage, with
a ceiling so "some time this month" still fails.
THREE MODELLING BUGS THE TESTS FOUND
Each was found by a test failing, not by reading the code:
- Median absolute deviation alone reads a user alternating 25 and 37 as
perfectly consistent, because half her deviations are zero. Twenty
disagreeing cycles came back High, breaking §15's rule that volume alone
must never buy High confidence. Spread is now the larger of MAD and mean
absolute deviation; robustness comes from IntervalAnalysis down-weighting
what is questionable, which is a better place for it.
- Recency weighting assumes the recent past predicts the near future. For a
variable user that is false — her latest cycle is a draw from a wide
distribution, not a signal — and weighting it equally cost three days on the
§51 variable fixture. Recency is now trusted in proportion to how much her
cycles actually agree.
- A fixed one-day floor on trend detection fired on a 42-day-cycle history
whose medians differed by a single day, turning an exact forecast into a
wrong one. One day is a real trend at 28 and rounding error at 42, so the
floor is relative to the user's own spread.
WIRED THROUGH, NOT JUST TESTED
PredictionInput carries recentAbsoluteErrors, and CycleRepository feeds the
scored errors back in. Without that the app stores every error it makes and
never reads one back — measuring accuracy rather than learning from it, with the
widening happening only in a unit test. A repository test asserts the errors
actually reach the engine.
BaselinePredictionEngine stays as the control, and both engines run the same
§51 acceptance suite, so the next engine's improvement is measurable too.
108 tests, all passing. ./gradlew check green. Verified on a device.
closes#10closes#11closes#12closes#14
IntervalAnalysis turns confirmed starts into weighted intervals and decides what
looks questionable — relative to this user's own history, never to a constant.
That distinction is the whole point. A global "over 40 days is suspicious" rule
gets exactly one group wrong, and it is the group whose cycles are already
unusual: the person this product exists for, and the one most tired of apps
assuming she is average. 45 days is unremarkable at a usual of 43 and worth
questioning at a usual of 29. Both are tests.
Two flags, because they earn different responses. A gap near a whole multiple of
the usual is a probable missed entry and produces §14's question. A gap merely
far from usual is down-weighted and left alone — asking would be the
over-questioning §25 warns against, and §51's 45-against-29 outlier is exactly
that case.
Nothing is ever dropped. §12 step 2: unusual data is marked for review or given
less influence, never silently deleted. A questionable interval keeps a quarter
of its recency weight, and a test asserts it is still present and still counts.
Recency decay is here too, ready for the centre in #10: newest cycle weight 1.0,
each older one 0.85 of the last.
12 new tests. The §51 acceptance cases still pass unchanged.
closes#13
checkModuleBoundaries holds the dependency tables in docs/architecture/README.md
as a check: every module's permitted project dependencies, plus the rule that
domain:cycle and domain:prediction must never apply an Android plugin. core:ads
is already in the map with an empty permitted set, before the module exists —
PRODUCT_PLAN.md §34 is non-negotiable, and a guard written alongside the code it
constrains is one shaped around whatever exception somebody wanted at the time.
It lists every violation rather than the first, and refuses to report a pass
when it examined no modules at all.
THE GUARD FAILED ITS OWN FIRST PROOF
prove-guard.sh injected a forbidden dependency into :domain:prediction and the
guard reported "7 modules checked, no violations". The root project is
configured before its subprojects, so reading subprojects.configurations from
the root script saw every configuration empty — it had been green over an empty
map since the moment it was written, and would have been trusted for months.
Collection moved into afterEvaluate, and the task now throws rather than passing
if it ends up with no modules. Three proofs recorded in the architecture doc,
all re-run and all red: a domain module reaching upward, :app reaching past the
repository straight to Room, and a module with no rule being reported as
unmeasured rather than assumed fine.
TWO REAL BUGS FROM WIRING IT INTO `check`
Running the whole check for the first time turned up Android lint errors that
would have shipped:
NewApi: java.time.LocalDate#ofInstant requires API 34 (minSdk is 26)
NewApi: java.time.LocalDate#EPOCH requires API 34 (minSdk is 26)
Both are on the recalculation path. On any device below Android 14 — most of
the install base this app targets — that is a crash. Neither the unit tests nor
the API 36 emulator could see it; lint is the only thing that could.
Replaced with atZone().toLocalDate() and ofEpochDay(0), which are API 26.
Also cleared the lint warnings that were real: a redundant activity label, and
a round launcher icon declared but never referenced. The two that remain are
deliberate and now say so where the warning is read — targetSdk 36 is Play's
floor and raising it opts into untested runtime behaviour, and the -v26 mipmap
qualifier stays because removing it makes AAPT fail to resolve the icon at all.
./gradlew check now passes with 0 lint errors across all seven modules.
70 unit tests, all passing.
closes#7
The Batch 01 vertical slice from PRODUCT_PLAN.md §58 now runs on a device:
launch, log a period, it is stored, the forecast recalculates, edit or delete it
and the forecast moves again. Hilt wiring, a TodayViewModel exposing one
immutable state, and a working surface that says "Batch 01 · working surface" at
the top so nobody mistakes it for the designed Today screen, which is Batch 03.
THE DEFECT THIS FOUND, ON A DEVICE
Tapping "Started today" twice on the same day killed the app:
FATAL EXCEPTION: main
android.database.sqlite.SQLiteConstraintException: UNIQUE constraint failed:
period_records.startDate
Not a hypothetical — the crash was reproduced on emulator-5580, the fix
applied, and the same two taps then produced "That day is already logged." with
the process still alive and zero FATAL lines in logcat.
The constraint is right: a duplicate must not overwrite the original row and
lose its createdAt and source. The API around it was wrong. Repeating a tap
when you are not sure the first one registered is an ordinary thing for a person
to do, not a fault, and it must never be an exception. So the period writes
return PeriodWriteResult — Added, AlreadyRecorded, Updated, Conflict, NotFound —
and only genuine faults still throw.
editPeriod had the same hole: moving a record onto a date another record holds.
That is refused rather than merged, because merging would delete a period the
user entered and only they can settle it.
The ViewModel now installs a CoroutineExceptionHandler as a backstop. In a
health app a crash mid-write is adjacent to losing what was just entered, and a
message somebody can read beats a process that vanished. The message carries the
exception type and never a record's contents (§45).
Four regression tests pin all of it, plus two instrumented tests on a real
file-backed database that close and reopen it — what a force-stop actually does,
and something an in-memory database cannot fail.
70 unit tests and 2 instrumented tests, all passing. Release APK 1.2 MB.
closes#6
core/data is the seam between storage and everything else. Reads return domain
types, cycles are derived rather than stored, and the forecast is a function of
the data instead of a field somebody has to remember to refresh — so §11's
"recalculate after a confirmed start, after an edit, after a Not yet" is
automatic rather than three call sites.
Confirming a period is four writes in one transaction, because a partial result
is a corrupt history rather than a failed action: write the record, score the
forecast that was standing, clear the "not yet" observations it resolved, and
snapshot a fresh forecast.
THE DEFECT THIS FOUND
A test expecting one scored prediction found three. The cause was not the test:
every historical period entered during onboarding was scoring the current
forecast against a date in the past, inventing an error for a prediction nobody
had ever been shown. §16's "your predictions are getting better" would have been
populated with figures the app made up about itself — plausible ones, which is
what makes it expensive to notice.
Two rules now, both pinned by tests:
- exactly one unscored snapshot exists at a time. A forecast superseded before
its outcome was known is not a wrong forecast, and counting it lets one
cycle contribute several errors.
- a confirmed start only scores a forecast made on or before it. Anything
earlier is backfill and leaves the standing forecast alone.
Accuracy also stays quiet below three scored predictions. One lucky forecast
reading "average error: 0 days" is an overstatement, not a measurement.
THE ROOM BOUNDARY, HELD THREE WAYS
implementation rather than api on core:database; CycleRepository's constructor
internal because it names a PeriodDatabase; reads mapped to domain types in
Mappers.kt. Callers use CycleData.repository(context) and never learn Room
exists. Verified rather than asserted: grep -rn "androidx.room" app/src domain
is empty, and Room appears zero times in :app's debugCompileClasspath.
No fallbackToDestructiveMigration: it turns a forgotten migration into a silent
wipe of the user's entire cycle history on update.
Also fixed: `domain/*` inside a KDoc silently opened a nested block comment —
Kotlin block comments nest — which broke compilation in a way the error message
pointed nowhere near.
58 tests across the project, all passing.
closes#5
core/datastore holds the settings from PRODUCT_PLAN.md §10 — notification
privacy, reminder time, the three reminder toggles, biometric lock, theme, the
ads entitlement and whether onboarding finished.
Two defaults are decisions, and each has a test whose job is to stop it being
changed by accident:
- notification privacy defaults to DISCREET (§28). A default of DIRECT would
put menstrual detail on a lock screen before the user has been asked a
single question, and a notification read over a shoulder is the likeliest
real privacy breach in this product.
- fertility reminders default to off. Most users are not tracking fertility
and an unrequested ovulation notification is an unpleasant surprise.
An unrecognised stored value falls back to the SAFE option rather than to
whatever enum entry happens to be first — a rollback or a hand-edited file must
not be able to turn DISCREET into DIRECT. Tested for privacy mode, theme and an
out-of-range reminder time.
This is a separate store rather than two more Room tables, and the reason is a
deletion semantic: Delete My Data removes the health history and must leave the
settings alone. Handing a user back a weaker privacy setting at the exact
moment they are exercising a privacy control is the worst possible time to do
it, and separate stores make the correct behaviour the easy one.
The repository takes a DataStore rather than a Context, so its 10 tests run on
the JVM against a temporary file — no emulator, no Robolectric. The Android
instance is supplied by DI at the app layer, the only place that should know
where a file lives.
41 tests across the project, all passing.
closes#4
core/database holds the four entities from PRODUCT_PLAN.md §10 —
period_records, spotting_records, prediction_records, not_yet_observations —
with DAOs returning Flow, epoch-day/epoch-milli converters, and the schema
exported to core/database/schemas and committed.
Three constraints are structural rather than remembered:
- startDate is UNIQUE and inserts ABORT rather than REPLACE. REPLACE would
delete the original row with its createdAt and source; §14 says health
history is never modified silently.
- spotting has its own table, so no query for periods can reach it. §25: it
must never start or reset a cycle.
- a prediction snapshot can be scored but not rewritten — score() sets only
actualStartDate and absoluteErrorDays. A snapshot editable after the fact
can only ever report that the app was right, which would make §16's whole
accuracy feature a lie.
deleteEverything() is one transaction and the only bulk delete in the module: a
partial wipe leaves the cycle reconstructible from the tables the user asked to
be rid of.
14 tests, on the JVM under Robolectric — no emulator.
THE SCHEMA GUARD, AND WHY IT IS A SCRIPT
SchemaTest was written as a drift guard and proved not to be one. Room
regenerates the schema export during compilation, so adding a column to
PeriodRecordEntity without bumping VERSION leaves the suite green while the
committed schema quietly changes underneath it. That was not reasoned about, it
was run: the column was added, 1.json gained it, and every test passed. On a
device that is "Room cannot verify the data integrity" — a crash on update,
after shipping.
scripts/schema-guard.sh asks git instead, which Room cannot overwrite. Proved
both ways before being trusted: green on a clean tree, exit 1 on the injected
drift. It runs in pre-commit when an entity or the schema directory is staged,
and the hook treats its exit 2 as a refusal.
SchemaTest keeps its four tests and now documents what it does not catch.
Room's own MigrationTestHelper is not used: every constructor needs an
Instrumentation and schema assets, and AGP 9's library source-set DSL throws
DefaultAndroidLibrarySourceSet_Decorated cannot be cast to
AndroidLibrarySourceSet when you add an asset directory. Recorded so the next
person does not spend the afternoon on it.
Docs updated in this commit, as their triggers required: the migration table
now has its version 1 row and the trap that makes such tables go stale, TOOLS
explains the seventh script, and the hooks README lists the new guard.
closes#3
doc-claims.sh reported 19 claimed paths that do not exist. Every one was a
deliberate forward reference — the planned modules in the architecture table,
the two documents the trust map records as absent on purpose, and the release
script Period declined.
A backticked path is read as a claim the file is there, so a document saying
"core/database does not exist yet" was asserting the opposite of what it meant.
docs/history/BATCH_LEDGER.md already records the idiom for this case; it is now
applied and stated where it is used, so the next forward reference does not
reintroduce the failure.
Also corrects WORK_CYCLE.md, inherited from the template, which pointed at a
scripts/release.sh this project does not have. A release here is a signed AAB
and a Play submission, so the security checklist carries that procedure.
doc-claims.sh now reports 152 claimed paths, all present, across 20 files.
Period was a bare directory holding one 2,527-line specification, with no git
repository, no tracker and no documentation convention. This is the adoption
from Projects/Template/START-HERE-New-Project.md, plus a project that compiles
so the hooks and future guards have something real to run against.
Documents. scaffold.sh created 19 paths, 0 skipped. The specification moved to
docs/planning/PRODUCT_PLAN.md unchanged in substance, with a status header; the
capitalised Docs/ is gone. Every scaffolded document was filled in for Period.
docs/OPERATIONS.md deleted — an offline app is not a deployed service.
DOC_TRUST_MAP.md written last, describing what is actually here, including what
this project deliberately does not have.
Code. Four Gradle modules. domain/cycle and domain/prediction are kotlin("jvm")
and cannot see the Android SDK, so the engine is testable without an emulator —
17 tests pass, 12 of them the acceptance cases from PRODUCT_PLAN.md §51.
BaselinePredictionEngine is a robust-median prototype and explicitly not the
product; it exists so Batch 02's replacement can be shown to be better rather
than merely different.
Versions verified against their official sources today rather than inherited
from the specification's own numbers, which that document asks for: Kotlin
2.4.10, AGP 9.3.1, Gradle 9.7.0, Compose BOM 2026.08.00, Room 2.8.4, Hilt
2.60.1. AGP 9 ships Kotlin built in, so org.jetbrains.kotlin.android is no
longer applied. compileSdk is 37 because current AndroidX requires it; targetSdk
stays 36, Play's floor from 2026-08-31, and the difference is deliberate.
Six scripts taken into scripts/; the rest declined and named in docs/TOOLS.md.
Three hooks in .githooks/, with pre-commit adapted to Gradle.
closes#1closes#2
null