closes#29
All eight illustrations are in the app, every onboarding step has art for the
first time, and the theme swap is resource resolution rather than a branch:
drawable/ and drawable-night/, so Android picks the asset and the artwork follows
a device theme change with nothing of ours running.
NOT VECTORS, AND THE ISSUE WAS WRONG TO ASK FOR THEM
#29 called for a redraw as Compose vector paths taking colour from theme tokens.
That is right for artwork that does not exist yet and wrong for gradient
landscapes with glow and depth — there is no honest VectorDrawable of one, and
the attempt loses the drawing or produces path soup slower than the image. §42
objects to *unnecessary* raster, which this is not.
The cost was never measured before it was argued about: all sixteen files at the
height they are actually drawn at come to 130 KB. Release APK 1.90 -> 2.03 MB.
WHAT ONLY A DEVICE SHOWED
Each drawing is composed as a card with its own rounded corner painted in, so the
pixels outside that curve are the card's own backdrop — near-black in the dark
set. Rendered unclipped, every illustration showed four notches against the app
background. Illustration() now clips just inside the painted curve.
WHAT STAYED A VECTOR
The calendar markers and CycleProgressMark, because they are drawn from data — a
marker's shape is what a day is, and the progress arc is where the user stands in
their cycle. CycleProgressMark moves from Illustrations.kt to CycleMarkers.kt so
the file layout carries that boundary.
Sized by height rather than a square box: the set has no common aspect ratio, and
height is the dimension that decides whether the primary button stays on screen.
Steps 3 and 6 take 104dp because they carry three buttons and three option cards;
verified by driving all seven steps, not by reasoning about it.
OnboardingPreviews.kt now has one entry per illustration, because a missing
drawable-night asset is invisible in light mode.
Driven end to end on PeriodMinSdk26 in both themes, no crash. ./gradlew check,
schema-guard and doc-claims all pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A second AVD exists — PeriodMinSdk26, API 26, Pixel 6 — and the app was built,
installed and driven on it end to end. Everything before today ran on API 36,
which the standing gaps list has said since Batch 01.
The QA plan now names both emulators, because rounds cite PeriodQA by name and
nothing defined it. It also carries the recreate command and three mechanical
traps that each cost time today:
- a windowed emulator dies with its session's X server (XIO: fatal IO error on
X server ":0") and took one run down mid-flow; -no-window has no such
dependency and screencap still works
- adb regularly has three devices attached on this machine, since other projects
keep emulators running, so the serial must be resolved from the AVD name
rather than assumed to be emulator-5554
- the debug build's application id carries a .debug suffix, so
`monkey -p dev.privacyllc.period` aborts with "No activities found to run"
after a successful install
The coverage doc's "No device at minSdk" gap is marked partly closed, with what
was reached (onboarding to first forecast, the date picker, all four tabs, a
relaunch after a cold boot) and what was not (notifications, the instrumented
suites, anything needing more than one cycle of history).
Also fixes a guard failure I introduced in ad085fb: that commit's log entry
named docs/architecture/scripts/forgejo-issue.py in backticks, and doc-claims.sh
reads a backticked path as a claim the file exists. I had run the guard before
writing the entry and not after. Named bare now, per the convention
DOC_TRUST_MAP.md already documents; doc-claims reports 255 paths, all present.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every document in the tree audited against the source, the tracker and git
history, each finding then given to a second reader tasked with refuting it.
74 raised, 12 refuted, 57 applied. No code changed.
THE README DESCRIBED A SKELETON
Its Status table — the one place a claim about what is built is allowed to live
— still read "there is no usable app yet", with Not built against Room, the four
core screens, fertility and notifications, and No round run against QA. Five
batches had shipped and three QA rounds had run.
TWO DOCUMENTS WERE SILENTLY NEVER FIRING
architecture/README.md and design/README.md wrote Governs: as prose ("the Gradle
module graph", "the design tokens in core/designsystem"). Neither contains a
path token, so doc-triggers.py reduced them to globs matching nothing, and one
real glob apiece made them look path-governing rather than subject-governing —
the state the script's own header calls invisible. Editing a Room entity never
fired the document owning the migration table. Both now fire, proved by running
the script.
SECURITY.md CLAIMED FOUR UNBUILT PROTECTIONS
App lock listed among what works offline; biometric/PIN gating described as
protecting app launch; the incognito launcher as existing; Play Billing in the
third parties table without the "not yet integrated" marker its neighbours
carry. All are Batch 06/07 work.
The advertising boundary was overstated in SECURITY.md and the README alike:
both said the ads module declares no dependency and a guard proves it. There is
no ads module. The pre-declared ":core:ads" to emptySet() rule is stricter than
the sentence it replaced and matches nothing until Batch 07, which is why the
guard is proved by injection rather than trusted.
SMALLER, EACH A REAL TRAP
WORK_CYCLE.md pointed at docs/architecture/scripts/forgejo-issue.py, a template
path absent here — missed by doc-claims.sh, which reads backticked prose and not
fenced blocks. ClaudeReport.md's Round notes said "No rounds yet" after three
rounds because ClaudeQAPlan.md's after-a-round list never named that section;
the playbook is fixed first. The instrumented-test count was eight in three
places and is four. HISTORY.md said the repository had no code and that nothing
had been tried and dropped, when three approaches had.
DELIBERATELY UNCHANGED
ClaudeReport.md's last verified build SHA stays at 0451fbe — no round has run
since, and moving it would claim a verification nobody performed. Every
DEVELOPMENT_LOG entry stays as written.
Guards: ./gradlew check, schema-guard.sh, doc-claims.sh (235 claimed paths, all
present), doc-triggers.py, and a link sweep over 21 markdown files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The rename was mostly a set of decisions about what NOT to touch: 239 domain
references, the Kotlin package, the applicationId and period.db all stay,
because "Period" is the central domain word as well as the old product name.
Records the two things a later reader would otherwise retry: the Command Center
slug cannot be changed (PATCH accepts the field and ignores it, and recreating
the project to change an invisible internal key would throw away its history),
and three names have to agree — repository, git remote, and the site's
forgejoRepo mapping — with the third being the one that fails silently.
Issue #9's body named the old repository path and has been corrected in the
tracker, so the command in it works for whoever picks it up.
"Period" was always a working name — PRODUCT_PLAN.md §55 said so. The real
identity arrived with the brand guide and artwork, and this makes the project
call itself by it.
The repository is renamed in place on Forgejo (null/Period ->
null/Privacy-Period-Tracker), which keeps all 30 commits, all 27 issues, all 8
milestones and the four severity labels — verified by counting them on both
sides rather than assuming a rename is lossless. The git remote follows in the
same breath, so this commit's automatic push is what proves the new URL works.
WHAT DELIBERATELY DID NOT MOVE
"Period" is the product name AND the central domain word, and a mass rename
would have turned the data model into nonsense. PeriodRecord, PeriodWriteResult,
confirmPeriodStart, the period_records table and the button that says "Started
period" all describe a menstrual period rather than a product, and all 239
references to them are untouched.
So are the Kotlin package and applicationId. dev.privacyllc.period already reads
correctly under the new name — privacyllc is the company, period is the app —
and changing it would rewrite 68 files, rename the Room schema directory and
break the hardcoded path in schema-guard.sh for no gain. period.db stays for a
sharper reason: renaming a database file orphans the data on every device that
already has it.
Sixteen files changed, and the diff is small on purpose.
THE NAME HAS A SPACE AND THE ARTWORK DOES NOT
Canonical is "Privacy: Period Tracker". The supplied wordmark sets it without
one, so logo.webp and banner.webp now disagree with every document and with the
app itself. BRAND_GUIDE.md §10 is updated to the space form and says plainly
that the drawn mark has not caught up. Filed separately rather than papered
over, because closing that gap needs an artist and not a rename.
Round 3 adds pass F, which became runnable for the first time. Eight
instrumented tests assert what a lock screen would render; the row says plainly
that nobody has yet looked at an actual locked screen, because the tests check
the notification object and the last mile is what the system chooses to draw.
Three guards have now failed their first proof — schema, boundaries,
permissions. Recorded as a rule rather than a run of bad luck: assume a new
guard is broken until it has been watched failing.
Records the fertility work, the third instance of "the app declines rather than
stretches", and the pre-commit hook that made `git rm` impossible.
Also records my own error rather than tidying it away: `git reset --hard` after
the post-commit hook has pushed does not undo the push, and it discarded an
uncommitted fix mid-proof. Reconciled forward instead of rewriting published
history.
Round 2 covers every screen Batch 03 built, pass by pass, with each partial and
not-run row carrying why. Three new standing gaps, all of them things nobody has
done rather than things that failed: TalkBack has never been run, text has never
been scaled, and nothing has run at minSdk.
The rule this session keeps demonstrating is now stated plainly in both files:
the defects in this project are found by running it, not by reading it.
Three consecutive guards and models were wrong in ways reading them would never
have shown, and each was caught by running it: the Room schema check that Room
itself defeated, the boundary check that examined nothing, and three modelling
faults in the engine. Recorded as a habit rather than three coincidences.
Round 1 was partial and says so, pass by pass, with each not-run row carrying
why. It found two defects that 70 green unit tests could not: the primary
button crashing the app on a second tap, and two API 34 date calls on the
recalculation path that would crash every device below Android 14.
Neither is filed in the tracker. Both were found and fixed inside the batch that
introduced them, before any build left this repository, and an issue closed by
the commit that created the code would be bookkeeping rather than a record.
New standing gap: nothing has been run on a device at this project's own minSdk.
Lint is a good guard for that and is not a substitute for one run on API 26.
doc-claims.sh reported 19 claimed paths that do not exist. Every one was a
deliberate forward reference — the planned modules in the architecture table,
the two documents the trust map records as absent on purpose, and the release
script Period declined.
A backticked path is read as a claim the file is there, so a document saying
"core/database does not exist yet" was asserting the opposite of what it meant.
docs/history/BATCH_LEDGER.md already records the idiom for this case; it is now
applied and stated where it is used, so the next forward reference does not
reintroduce the failure.
Also corrects WORK_CYCLE.md, inherited from the template, which pointed at a
scripts/release.sh this project does not have. A release here is a signed AAB
and a Play submission, so the security checklist carries that procedure.
doc-claims.sh now reports 152 claimed paths, all present, across 20 files.
Period was a bare directory holding one 2,527-line specification, with no git
repository, no tracker and no documentation convention. This is the adoption
from Projects/Template/START-HERE-New-Project.md, plus a project that compiles
so the hooks and future guards have something real to run against.
Documents. scaffold.sh created 19 paths, 0 skipped. The specification moved to
docs/planning/PRODUCT_PLAN.md unchanged in substance, with a status header; the
capitalised Docs/ is gone. Every scaffolded document was filled in for Period.
docs/OPERATIONS.md deleted — an offline app is not a deployed service.
DOC_TRUST_MAP.md written last, describing what is actually here, including what
this project deliberately does not have.
Code. Four Gradle modules. domain/cycle and domain/prediction are kotlin("jvm")
and cannot see the Android SDK, so the engine is testable without an emulator —
17 tests pass, 12 of them the acceptance cases from PRODUCT_PLAN.md §51.
BaselinePredictionEngine is a robust-median prototype and explicitly not the
product; it exists so Batch 02's replacement can be shown to be better rather
than merely different.
Versions verified against their official sources today rather than inherited
from the specification's own numbers, which that document asks for: Kotlin
2.4.10, AGP 9.3.1, Gradle 9.7.0, Compose BOM 2026.08.00, Room 2.8.4, Hilt
2.60.1. AGP 9 ships Kotlin built in, so org.jetbrains.kotlin.android is no
longer applied. compileSdk is 37 because current AndroidX requires it; targetSdk
stays 36, Play's floor from 2026-08-31, and the difference is deliberate.
Six scripts taken into scripts/; the rest declined and named in docs/TOOLS.md.
Three hooks in .githooks/, with pre-commit adapted to Gradle.
closes#1closes#2
null