Privacy-Period-Tracker/README.md

181 lines
9.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Privacy: Period Tracker
```text
Status: Draft
Owner: _null
Last reviewed: 2026-08-18
Governs: README.md as the project-facing overview for Privacy: Period Tracker
Review trigger: The first buildable feature release; any change to the stack, the
privacy promise, or how the project is built and run
```
A private Android period tracker that learns **your** cycle rather than the
average person's — and never sells your data.
[What it is](#what-it-is) | [Status](#status) | [Build and run](#build-and-run) |
[Repository map](#repository-map) | [Project docs](#project-docs) |
[Agent notes](#agent-notes)
_{ Android / Google Play | Kotlin + Jetpack Compose | Room, offline-first |
Personalized prediction with an honest window | Discreet notifications |
No account, no server, no data sale }_
The core loop is:
```text
Track → Learn → Predict → Remind → Learn again
```
## What it is
A focused tracker that answers one question well: **when is my next period
likely to start?** It records confirmed period dates, learns the individual's
pattern from them, and produces a most-likely date with a window and a
confidence label — never a bare date presented as fact. From that it estimates
ovulation and the fertile window, and it asks discreetly whether the period
started, using both *yes* and *not yet* to improve the next forecast.
Two promises hold the product up:
> **Your period. Better predicted.** — once there is enough personal history,
> the app must not fall back to a generic 28-day cycle. A user recording 34, 35,
> 36, 34, 35 who is predicted 28 is a core product defect, not a tuning issue.
> **Your cycle belongs to you.** We will never sell period history, fertility
> information, ovulation estimates, cycle predictions or personally identifiable
> information — to advertisers, data brokers or anyone else.
The second is held structurally rather than remembered, and the rule was written
before the code it constrains: `checkModuleBoundaries` in the root
`build.gradle.kts` already carries `":core:ads" to emptySet()`, so when the ads
module arrives in Batch 07 it may declare **no** project dependency at all —
stricter than "nothing from the cycle database or the prediction domain". It is
not in `settings.gradle.kts` yet, so today the rule matches no module, which is
why the guard is proved against injected violations rather than trusted.
What it deliberately is **not** — no community, no pregnancy mode, no chatbot,
no article feed, no symptom encyclopedia, and not contraception — is in
[docs/planning/PROJECT_PLAN.md](docs/planning/PROJECT_PLAN.md).
## Status
**Five of the eight batches are done.** Foundation, prediction engine, core UX,
fertility and notifications have landed; privacy and security (Batch 06) is the
next work. Every row below cites the file or test that proves it.
| Surface | Status | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Documentation tree and tracker convention | Adopted | this tree; milestones and issues in the tracker |
| Gradle / Kotlin / Compose project | Builds | `./gradlew assembleDebug` and `assembleRelease` both pass |
| Material 3 theme and tokens | Built | `core/designsystem` |
| Four-tab navigation shell | Built | `app/src/main/kotlin/dev/privacyllc/period/navigation/PeriodApp.kt` — Today, Calendar, Insights, Settings, each wired to its real screen |
| Cycle model and interval derivation | Built | `domain/cycle` (13 tests); `domain/prediction/src/main/kotlin/dev/privacyllc/period/domain/prediction/IntervalAnalysis.kt` (12 tests) |
| Prediction engine | Built — personalized | `PersonalPredictionEngine`, wired in `app/src/main/kotlin/dev/privacyllc/period/di/DataModule.kt`; the 12 acceptance tests from PRODUCT_PLAN §51 run against both engines (`PersonalAcceptanceTest`, `BaselineAcceptanceTest`), and `EngineComparisonTest` scores the personal engine against the retained baseline every build |
| Room persistence, DataStore | Built | `core/database` (schema v1 exported, `SchemaTest` + `scripts/schema-guard.sh`), `core/datastore`, `core/data` |
| Onboarding, Today, Calendar, Insights | Built | `app/src/main/kotlin/dev/privacyllc/period/feature/` — onboarding, today, calendar, insights; `OnboardingViewModelTest`, `TodayViewModelTest`, `TodayUiStateTest` |
| Fertility window and ovulation estimate | Built | `domain/prediction/src/main/kotlin/dev/privacyllc/period/domain/prediction/FertilityEstimate.kt`, 11 tests; shown on Today and Calendar |
| Discreet notifications | Built | `core/notifications` (24 JVM tests), instrumented `NotificationPrivacyTest` |
| App lock, export, irreversible delete, monetization | Not built | Batches 0607 |
| QA | Round 3 run, partial | [docs/qa/ClaudeReport.md](docs/qa/ClaudeReport.md) — partial at `0451fbe`; TalkBack, text scaling, `minSdk` and a real locked screen still unreached |
`BaselinePredictionEngine` is still in the tree, but it stopped being the
product in Batch 02. `DataModule` provides `PersonalPredictionEngine` — the
recency-weighted, trend-aware, "not yet"-conditioned engine PRODUCT_PLAN §12
specifies — and the baseline is now the control: `EngineComparisonTest` scores
both over the §51 fixtures every build, so "the new engine is better" is a number
rather than an opinion.
## Build and run
Prerequisites: a JDK 21 and the Android SDK with **platform 37** and
**build-tools 37.0.0** installed, `ANDROID_HOME` set.
```bash
git config core.hooksPath .githooks # per clone, every clone — see below
./gradlew test # JVM suites, no emulator, ~1s
./gradlew assembleDebug # app/build/outputs/apk/debug/
./gradlew assembleRelease # minified, unsigned
```
`compileSdk` is 37 because the current AndroidX libraries require it;
`targetSdk` is 36, Google Play's floor for new apps from 2026-08-31. They are
deliberately different — raising `targetSdk` opts the app into runtime behaviour
changes and is a tested decision, not a build fix.
**`git config core.hooksPath .githooks` is per clone.** Without it the hooks are
not installed and fail silently, which is the failure mode they exist to
prevent. `post-commit` pushes; see
[docs/architecture/githooks/README.md](docs/architecture/githooks/README.md).
## Repository map
```text
app/ application module, MainActivity, navigation shell, DI
core/designsystem/ Material 3 theme and colour tokens
core/database/ Room entities, DAOs, converters, the exported schema
core/datastore/ user preferences that are not health history
core/data/ CycleRepository — the only module that touches a DAO
core/notifications/ reminder copy, privacy modes, WorkManager scheduling
domain/cycle/ pure Kotlin — period records, cycle derivation
domain/prediction/ pure Kotlin — the forecast, window and confidence
scripts/ six from the template, plus schema-guard.sh, our own
.githooks/ pre-commit, commit-msg, post-commit
docs/ product, architecture, design, brand, QA, security, history
```
`domain/*` are `kotlin("jvm")` modules and cannot see the Android SDK. That is
on purpose: the prediction engine is the product, so it needs the most tests,
and tests that need an emulator are tests that do not get run.
## Project docs
Detailed procedures belong in docs; **open work belongs in the tracker**, not in
this README.
| Doc | Purpose |
| --- | --- |
| [docs/DOC_TRUST_MAP.md](docs/DOC_TRUST_MAP.md) | Which document owns which answer, and which source wins when records disagree. **Read this first.** |
| [docs/planning/PRODUCT_PLAN.md](docs/planning/PRODUCT_PLAN.md) | The full V1 specification — prediction requirements, screens, copy, compliance |
| [docs/planning/PROJECT_PLAN.md](docs/planning/PROJECT_PLAN.md) | The short vision, the stack and its reasons, and what this is deliberately not |
| [docs/WORK_CYCLE.md](docs/WORK_CYCLE.md) | What happens at the end of a piece of work |
| [docs/architecture/README.md](docs/architecture/README.md) | Modules, boundaries, data shapes, migrations |
| [docs/design/README.md](docs/design/README.md) | Tone, and the four rules that settle design arguments |
| [docs/security/SECURITY.md](docs/security/SECURITY.md) | Threat model, the advertising boundary, logging rules |
| [docs/TOOLS.md](docs/TOOLS.md) | Which script to run, and which ones can stop you |
## Where the tracker is
Milestones are batches, issues are deliverables, and severity labels are exactly
`P0`, `P1`, `P2` and `release-blocker`. Credentials come from the environment,
never from this repository:
```bash
set -a; . ~/.openclaw/docker-registry.env; set +a
python3 scripts/forgejo-issue.py list
```
Two traps that cost an hour each otherwise: Cloudflare 1010-blocks clients that
do not look like a browser or curl, so every request needs
`User-Agent: curl/8.5.0``forgejo-issue.py` sends it and anything new must
too. And `/issues` returns pull requests unless `type=issues` is passed.
## Agent notes
- **Product truth comes from the code and the tracker before prose.**
- Do not keep a work list in this README or anywhere else in `docs/`.
- Finish with [docs/WORK_CYCLE.md](docs/WORK_CYCLE.md), every time: close what
you finished with the evidence, close the milestone if the batch landed,
update the documents the change triggered **in the same commit**, push, log
the entry, then reconcile and write the summary and next action.
- Nothing on privacyllc.dev writes itself except the tracker counts and the
pushed docs.
- **Do not claim a feature is built** unless you can cite the file, test or
screenshot that proves it. The status table above is the standard.
- **Verify current stable versions before changing the toolchain.** The ones in
`gradle/libs.versions.toml` were checked against the official sources on
2026-08-18; PRODUCT_PLAN.md asks for that check rather than for its own
numbers to be trusted.
- Never put a cycle date, a prediction or a fertility state into a log, an
analytics event, or an ad request.